Midwest Natural Resources Group

Private Sector Interest in Wetland Restoration

May 31, 2007
Prepared by John Perrecone, USEPA,
312-353-1149; perrecone.john@epa.gov


Background:

At the last two MNRG meetings (Omaha in July '06 and Chicago in November '06), we discussed how to involve the private sector in assisting the federal agencies in wetland restoration. I suggested that the MNRG investigate if the Corporate Wetland Restoration Partnership (CWRP) can assist or if there were any other approaches that could be used. I was asked to talk to a number of private sector entities to understand what would motivate them to work with the federal agencies and to find those opportunities to initiate projects here in the Midwest.

top of page

Progress:

Since the meeting, I have completed the following:

top of page

Message:

Since EPA regulates the companies that we want to perform restoration work, I visited with Daniel of the WHC in order to reduce any concern that EPA was visiting them with another motive. Once there, we often met with their environmental restoration staff and we received a short overview of their work followed by a tour of the actual restoration. At the same time, I emphasized that we were seeking to create sustainable partnerships with industry in order to help achieve the 200,000 acre wetland restoration goal of the Great Lakes Regional Collaboration (GLRC). I stated that if industry did participate with the agencies that they would be recognized in some way, shape or form—perhaps by a visit from one of the federal Regional Managers as well as prominent signs stating their contribution. Since it has not yet been devised, their efforts would also be formally tracked in the GLRC inventory. Finally, I introduced the CWRP concept to them as another approach to achieve wetland gains with a broader set of partners.

top of page

Findings:

top of page

Recommendations:

Based upon my short survey of the private sector, I feel that the private sector will work with the MNRG to achieve wetland gains as long as they feel it is a "safe" for them to participate. In that regard, we must have a transparent system that allows both sides of this partnership to participate in a meaningful way. I recommend:

top of page